The Start of 2025 Trade War!
- Jun 16
- 2 min read
China’s retaliatory tariffs—on soybeans, pork, etc.—slashed U.S. farm exports. This triggered $12–16 billion in federal bailouts. While subsidies endured, market access remained unstable. New econometric studies confirm retaliatory tariffs effectively neutralized any domestic business gains.
Broader Economic Impact: Global Drag and Uncertainty
Global growth: The World Bank now projects a sluggish 2.3% global growth in 2025—the slowest since the 1960s—largely due to trade barriers.
Investment chill: Firms delayed expansions due to uncertainty driven by tariffs. IMF/OECD repeatedly warned of diminished global output.
Market confidence: Bloomberg estimates Trump’s trade actions could reduce the world economy by $1 trillion and cost 690,000 U.S. jobs by 2030.
Diplomatic fallout: The U.S. strained alliances; Europe threatened digital taxes; Asia pivoted to regional trade agreements. International experts, including Sydney Greenhouse, called Trump’s tariff strategy a “lose-lose proposition.”
Partial Wins & Sectoral Gains
It wasn’t all negative:
Steel and aluminum saw short-term gains from protectionist tariffs.
Certain manufacturers (e.g., layered chemicals, metal parts) benefited modestly.
A Brooklyn-based manufacturer, Rodgers Wade, said tariffs temporarily restored domestic orders—but margins squeezed each time.
Investments in some midstream processing plants did resume.
Still, these gains were overshadowed by widespread net loss and collateral damage. Economy-wide effects dominated.
2025 Trade “Truce” with China: Stable Pause, Not a Solution
In June 2025, after Geneva and London negotiations, a framework truce emerged:
U.S. duties frozen at fixed 55% on Chinese goods
China retaliates with a flat 10% tariff on U.S. imports
China resumes rare-earth exports (civilian use), with 6‑month licensing process
U.S. maintains AI chip export controls
Student visas for Chinese nationals continue uninterrupted
But key issues remain:
Military-grade rare-earth exports still restricted, undermining full defense sector recovery
Tariffs persist—no rollback to pre‑2017 levels
AI, IP theft, overcapacity, and subsidies remain unresolved
Many call it a “managed tension”—not a breakthrough
Analysis: Did U.S. Citizens Benefit?
For Consumers:
Short-term gains are minimal. Prices remain inflated. Nope, no meaningful tariff relief.
For Workers & Farmers:
Farmers escaped further bailouts, but market access stays rocky. Manufacturing jobs saw tiny gains, but workforce losses overshadow them.
For Companies & Investors:
Predictability improved—but margins are squeezed, costs remain high, investments limited.
For Economy & Trade:
Growth and confidence still lag. Structural trade issues remain unaddressed. Only superficial calm achieved.
Path Forward: Smarter Trade = Better Outcomes
To build lasting prosperity, a smarter trade playbook is essential:
Targeted enforcement on IP, labor and environment standards
Pro-competitive trade deals with allies, not unilateral tariffs
Supply-chain resilience via diversification and strategic reshoring
Coordination with industries, not surprise tariff bombs
Tariffs were a blunt instrument. Now, it’s time for precision strategy.
Conclusion: Rhetoric vs Results
Trump shined a light on unfair trade practices—and did force China to engage—but the methods often backfired: growth slowed, consumers bought cheaper elsewhere, jobs disappeared, and global trust frayed.
Today’s truce brings stability—but leaves unfinished business. What’s needed now is a smart, nuanced, and forward-looking trade policy—one that boosts America where it matters: for workers, farmers, consumers, and global partners alike.

Comments